Draft Day

When you’re watching a movie about any sort of sports draft, you can almost certainly be assured that something or other is going to come right down to the buzzer, and that’s going to be our primary source of drama and tension. I imagine a trade deadline movie would be the same way. In order to keep an audience engaged you need to make sure that at least much of what precedes this “down to the wire” stuff is worth watching. In Draft Day, it most certainly is not.

I’m not sure if we’ve previously gotten a movie about the NFL draft, but it sure feels like we have. Everything leading up to the “buzzer moment” is as formulaic as they come, and it’s not even particularly impactful. Very little of it matters, and the way that it builds up certain characters means, assuming you know anything about sports drafting — and possibly even if you don’t — you’ll be able to figure out more or less exactly how things are going to play out. That renders the only form of drama and suspense the film could potentially generate entirely worthless.

Draft Day takes place over the last 13 hours before the NFL draft. The lead is the general manager of the Cleveland Browns, Sonny Weaver, Jr. (Kevin Costner). He’s told by the team’s owner in an early scene that he needs to make a splash, or else he’s fired. So, he trades the future for the number one pick. This upsets the head coach (Denis Leary), and might potentially ruin the franchise in the long term. The rest of the film involves Sonny attempting to figure out if he made the right choice, and if he didn’t, trying to rectify it.

If you’ve seen the trailer for Draft Day, you might have been led into thinking that the whole movie involves wheeling and dealing, all while our protagonist goes against all conventional logic in order to solve all of the problems that the club has. This is what happens in the last ten minutes of the film. Draft Day runs for just under two hours long. What do we get for the rest of the running time? Pointless drama that doesn’t amount to much, and actually goes to weaken the nail-biting finale.

The problem, I think, comes from the fact that we’re only introduced to three players in the draft. There’s a quarterback, Bo Callahan (Josh Pence), whom everyone believes will go #1. There are also two other players, although I can’t remember their names or positions. Sonny is determined to find something wrong with Callahan, while the other two players are good family men. What do you think happens? Can’t you already figure it out? Oh, right, and Cleveland already has a quarterback for the season.

Draft Day doesn’t even seem to want to spend much effort hiding exactly what’s going to happen. It only introduces us to important characters, it sets them all up on a clear “side,” and Sonny seems set in his ways. When it comes down to the film’s final moments, about the only thing we have to find out is how exactly Sonny is going to leverage his way into doing what seems like the impossible, but in reality is the only logical outcome.

We’re also forced to sit through non-drama involving Sonny and the Browns’ capologist, Ali (Jennifer Garner), who are in a secret relationship, as well as a side-story with Sonny and his mother (Ellen Burstyn). None of this works because the characters are so shallow. Sonny is singularly focused on the draft, Ali has absolutely no depth, and we don’t get enough from his mother to even consider her more than a plot device in order to bring up some past “feelings” between Sonny and his father, who was the head coach before Sonny fired him — for reasons that are treated as important and secret but are neither.

This is not an “actors’ film.” Kevin Costner is fine and you can believe him as the GM, but there are no showy scenes or even much quick wit required. He’s just there, in that role, doing things that real GMs do. It’s not a glamorous job, nor is it one that’s really worth following, even on a day as “exciting” as the NFL draft. Jennifer Garner, of whom I’ve been very critical in the past, is also fine here. But that’s just it. Everyone’s fine, but nobody stands out. Well, nobody except for Sam Elliot in a cameo role, and perhaps only because I kept wondering if it was Sam Elliot or Jim Leyland (they look somewhat similar).

I wonder if you have to be a big NFL fan in order to get much out of Draft Day. This is certainly a bigger deal to Americans than to audiences in any other place in the world, and I don’t want to presume anything on their behalf. Browns fans might especially find something to like, given that the film features their team prominently, and because that very team is a mess right now in real life. I can imagine some of them leaving the cinema and making statements such as: “I wish Sonny Weaver, Jr. could be our GM.”

Draft Day is a buzzer-beater film, one in which all of the drama and tension boils down to the final few minutes. The problem with this, especially here, is that there’s very little leading up to the finale that’s worth seeing, and much of it actually weakens the impact that such a conclusion could have. The characters are shallow, the performances are nothing special, and it’s so predictable and formulaic that it becomes a bore, even during its ending.

One thought on “Draft Day

  1. , the GMO debate has been one Ie28099ve been close to for many years and the idea for a novel about it had been flntiaog around in my head for a long time before I finally decided to put e2809cpen to paper.e2809d The fact that I was unable to discover any other available fiction on this topic only reinforced my desire to write the book. I have, over the years, developed what may be an unusual approach to writing fiction, specifically regarding characters. I have a template that contains perhaps 50 questions about what a person is like, and I occasionally sit down and simply create a new person without having any story or book to insert them into. The questions include everything from their appearance to what they like to eat, what hobbies they have, political views, all sorts of things. At the moment I have a e2809clibrarye2809d of perhaps twenty characters sitting in my files that have not yet made it into any story. As for the impact of my research on my own views on GM technology and public policye28093I cane28099t honestly say that it took me in a different direction. The subject is immensely complex and nuanced, and I certainly enjoyed the opportunity to learn about the different issues attending the debate. Even today, I cannot say that I am e2809cfore2809d or e2809cagainste2809d GM food. I believe that, like all scientific endeavor, a great deal of caution is called for in rolling these products into the marketplace, particularly given that the health effects of new food products frequently do not manifest themselves for many years. As for the public policy side of things, I do have a problem with companies patenting seeds/plants that have either occurred naturally or been developed over the centuries by rural farmers. While I understand the need for corporations to protect intellectual property, the idea that a time-honored practice like saving back seeds from a harvest for use in subsequent years could suddenly be made illegal strikes me as patently immoral and counter-productive. As I said, a very complex and fraught issue that merits continuing debate (not to be confused with the demagoguery and vitriol that frequently arises). Many thanks again for reading, and for involving your class in this important discussion. Brian


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>