Archive for October, 2009

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

A Review by Jason L. King

Starring: Robert DeNiro, Kenneth Branagh
Directed by: Kenneth Branagh
Rated: R for horrific images
Movie Released: 1994
IMDB Link

The summer months have been whisked away and we are now heading into autumn with leaves turning colors and people’s doorsteps sporting jack-o-lanterns and skeletons. October is Halloween, month of the monsters, hence why many of the reviews you are seeing are horror films or monster movies. Throughout the month of October 2009, I will be focusing at least a solid portion of my reviews on various movie monsters each week. Week #4’s movie monster is Frankenstein’s Monster.

Final Grade:

Anyone who has known me for a few years knows that I am sucker for a good Robert DeNiro film. So it should come as no surprise that if Robert DeNiro is in a movie about Frankenstein it would be in my list of films to watch on Frankenstein week on the site. I’ve seen DeNiro in the lowest points of his career playing an evil scientist (Godsend- if you don’t remember it, forget I mentioned it and move on). So only knowing that DeNiro is in the film, I popped it into the DVD player. Bear in mind, many times I don’t even read the back of films before I watch them, so I assumed DeNiro was going to be Dr. Frankenstein. I was a bit more surprised when DeNiro was actually Frankenstein’s Monster.

By now every one knows the basic plot of a Frankenstein. Made of body parts of killers and dead bodies, the monster is a creation of the Doctor Frankenstein, a man who sets out to create life out of something lifeless. However, he becomes horrified by his own creation and plans to destroy it until the monster escapes and begins to destroy things in it’s path.

The story of Frankenstein of course is based off of Mary Shelley’s classic novel, which I am quite ashamed to admit that I have not read. In fact, I have a copy that has long sat on my bookshelf, a gift from a teacher years ago that for whatever reason I have never brought myself to reading. I have been told that this film is the closest adaptation to the novel even though they do have some slight differences. The film spends a great deal of time and detail on keeping this the period piece that the novel was. Set in the late 1700’s we get a time period where if you were not wearing a powdered wig, you just were not popular. (Side note- How the times have changed, if you wore a powdered wig in public now, people would think you were a buffoon).

What I really enjoyed about this film was that the film gave us time to see that Frankenstein’s creation was not a monster incapable of good. We follow it as it teaches itself to speak and read, and as it tries to befriend an elderly blind man and his family. In this film, the creature is more of a scared, misunderstood soul than a evil being. Robert DeNiro, despite limited speech does a wonderful job as the creature and brings the character’s true creepiness and goodness to life.

I also enjoyed the newer “look” of the film. Despite being a period piece, the film had more of a modern horror feel to it. One of the ways that this is most evident is in the creation of Frankenstein’s monster. This monster is no flat topped, bolt necked, green thing wandering around in a suit. Instead it is a sewn together, stitched up hideous bald DeNiro- a truly grotesque looking beast.

Perhaps what I didn’t like about this film, is I felt it had a long, very slow drag to it. Once the film got started and the monster escaped it actually improves. The problem is getting to that point. I get the point that it takes time to create life by sewing things together. I also get it that when you are sewing together bodies in your basement as a way to pass the time, people may think you are trifle bit mad. Get on with the show I say!

Also along side of DeNiro, we have Kenneth Branagh working both as Doctor Frankenstein and the director of the film. Perhaps Branagh’s name is not exactly the most familiar of names but very well may be in the future. He is slated to begin production on Marvel’s Thor that is due in theaters in 2011. Branagh does a much better job behind the camera than he does on screen. I felt like something was missing from his role. Many times I kept feeling like the role was instead being played by Ewan McGregor, I’m not sure what it was that kept me thinking this, but I digress. Branagh played the role like a B rate stage actor, whom could have been easily replaced by another actor. Aparently I wanted it to be Ewan McGregor for some reason. Alongside Branagh is Helna Bonaham Carter, whom I thought might make it through the film without playing a creepo. So much for that. Sadly I’m not surprised.

When the film was all said and done I was torn. There were things I liked about it. However, there were just as many things that I didn’t like about the film. When it comes right down to enjoyment, I enjoy my Frankenstein to be the classic, bolt necked, flat topped, flower picking friend I’ve grown to love over the years. DeNiro almost saved this one for me, and actually does a great job but it’s not enough. I enjoy the misunderstood insight but I disliked the journey getting there.

I’m going to do my best to channel The Mike to end this review. Upon watching the Rob Zombie Halloween film, he growled at the screen and said, “It’s really not that bad of a horror film, it’s just not a Halloween film.” I felt this way with Frankenstein. Even if it is closer to the novel, it’s just not a “Frankenstein” film as you would think of it. Stick with the 1930’s Frankenstein as you are planning your monster mash.

Frankenstein (1931)

A Review by Jason L. King

Starring: Boris Karloff
Directed by: James Whale
Rated: NR
Movie Released: 1931
IMDB Link

The summer months have been whisked away and we are now heading into autumn with leaves turning colors and people’s doorsteps sporting jack-o-lanterns and skeletons. October is Halloween, month of the monsters, hence why many of the reviews you are seeing are horror films or monster movies. Throughout the month of October 2009, I will be focusing at least a solid portion of my reviews on various movie monsters each week. Week #4’s movie monster is Frankenstein’s Monster.

Final Grade:

It is the most classic of the classic movie monsters that have captivated movie screens, Halloween costumes and every bit of Halloween garp ever created. Witches probably lead the way but following close in foot is none other than the main monster himself, Frankenstein.

In 1931 Universal Pictures set out to put Mary Shelley’s classic monster tale of Frankenstein on the big screen. They gathered the likes of young director James Whale and Boris Karloff, a man who along with Bella Lugosi transformed the history of monster movie cinema.

Of course like all Frankenstein stories, the 1931 version is no different, a scientist named Frankenstein works tirelessly in his lab to bring to life his own creation, a human made of body parts that he has sewn together. Upon a dark and stormy night, his creation is brought to life only to become a hideous monster with great strength who begins to terrorize the countryside.

What I truly enjoyed about this film is that despite being made in 1931, I felt that it has held up over the ages. The film doesn’t drag, feel old fashioned or too corny. In fact, it is by far the best of the best monster films made. Perhaps this is because of the acting in the film. Each actor does a wonderful job of adapting this tale to film, and I never felt the parts were being over acted in any way. As I have stated time and time again, my biggest problem with older films is the way they “ham” it up in front of the camera, over acting dialogue in a play like style. The actors of Frankenstein did no such thing. Because of this it makes the story seem even more realistic despite its fantastic nature.

Perhaps the greatest part of the film is Boris Karloff as the monster. Karloff plays the monster with wondrous ease and anyone can easily see why his portrayal of Frankenstein has become the standard vision of Frankenstein’s monster. Perhaps one of the best scenes in the film is a scene where Frankenstein’s monster meets Maria, a little girl who teaches him that flowers can float on a lake. In return, Frankenstein teaches her that little girls do not float like flowers. It is a sad, yet humorous part of the movie. But then again, I also laugh at the little girl and the exploding briefcase in the film The Untouchables.

In the end, Frankenstein is the perfect way to end your Halloween spookfest of monster films. If you haven’t seen it put it on your list of things to check out. You’ll be glad you took the time to see this classic.

District 9

A Review by Jason L. King

Starring: Sharlto Copely
Directed by: Neil Blomkamp
Rated: R for Violence and Gore
Movie Released: 2009
IMDB Link

The summer months have been whisked away and we are now heading into autumn with leaves turning colors and people’s doorsteps sporting jack-o-lanterns and skeletons. October is Halloween, month of the monsters, hence why many of the reviews you are seeing are horror films or monster movies. Throughout the month of October 2009, I will be focusing at least a solid portion of my reviews on various movie monsters each week. Week #2’s movie monster is Aliens.

Final Grade:

Finding a great conversation piece movie is sometimes hard to find. And when you do find those films, they normally are seen only by a select group of people, making it hard to drum up a good conversation about a film with people. This last week, I got a chance to chance to finally watch District 9, the new Sci Fi/drama film that debuted in theaters this summer.

District 9 is a mix of a SciFi film, an action film and drama all in one. Shot as a documentary film, District 9 follows a government agent in charge of evicting Alien beings named Prawns from District 9 to District 10. During his eviction process he is exposed to a alien genetic agent that is slowly transforming him into an alien himself.

From a social standpoint District 9 is filmed in Johannesburg and used many of the real shacks that were used by many African immigrants and natives years ago. They too were migrated and evicted from their homes, paralleling the story of District 9. The film also provides a great deal of social commentary on how humans treat other humans and other life forms and our sad obsession with weaponry and technology. Despite this heart heavy message, the film doesn’t beat you over the head with it, making it a success. I wanted to go into this film to be entertained, not lectured and I thought District 9 did a good job of not lecturing yet still giving the viewer something to think about.

I also really enjoyed that District 9 had a ton of action. There was a lot of Sci Fi action going on throughout the film, keeping viewers who didn’t want to “think” about the film equally entertained. Many times the film felt like a cross of Predator and Transformers giving viewers the sci fi action they need to keep the film moving. None the less don’t let that statement make you think the film lacks originality or substance. It brings a lot of new twists and turns to the table and finds ways of blowing stuff up in a way that can only be trumped by Michael Bay.

What I really didn’t like about the film is I had a very love-hate relationship with the camera direction. The film started out and ended with a documentary style film making approach, giving you a lot of handheld cam shots. Once the agent is exposed and goes on the run, the camera work shifts gears to this omniscient 3rd person camera shots, only to return back to documentary again at the end. While you don’t notice the transition from documentary film, you definitely notice the distracting transition back into it. With that point aside, I loved how the scenes were lit and scenes were set up. Director Neil Blomkamp does a fantastic job of slowly evolving the camera shots to portray each of the characters in the “light” he wants them to be in. With a simple slow move of the camera or an adjustment in the lighting, Blomkamp makes the Aliens seem more human and likable, and the humans more cruel and shady as the film progresses.

The film has a somewhat open ending, leaving you with a bit of critical thinking to decide what really happened or what really is going to happen. In this film, I felt like it really worked. I love films that give you enough subtle clues to have you know the ending, but at the same time doesn’t give away the ending. District 9 attempted this ending and would have pulled it off to near perfection. But since I think they were trying to go for a broad audience, they threw in one more ending scene that I felt was un-needed. I referred to this as the “redneck subtlety” ending. It was there to not so subtly scream “Hey- this is probably what we are hinting at, if you weren’t smart enough to get it!”

All in all, I really enjoyed District 9. I felt it left a lot unexplained, and the film had its share of problems but it also had its share of success. It is a great, original film coming out of Hollywood and these days that is something that is few and far between. If you get a chance to check it out, go for it. You can enjoy it as mindless entertainment, or you can make it a film to think about. I’ll leave that decision up to you.

PS…There are some of you who may want to post comments and discuss the film. If so, please start the discussion on Box Office Backtalk, our web forum so no spoilers are given away on this review!

The Wolf Man

A Review by Jason L. King

Starring: Lon Chaney Jr.
Directed by: George Wagner
Rated: NR
Movie Released: 1941
IMDB Link

The summer months have been whisked away and we are now heading into autumn with leaves turning colors and people’s doorsteps sporting jack-o-lanterns and skeletons. October is Halloween, month of the monsters, hence why many of the reviews you are seeing are horror films or monster movies. Throughout the month of October 2009, I will be focusing at least a solid portion of my reviews on various movie monsters each week. Week #3’s movie monster is Werewolves.

Final Grade:

Werewolves never get a fair shake in the world in my opinion. As you span many different films featuring the mythical movie monsters, it always seems the werewolf is the mythical stooge of Dracula or Frankenstein, or just perceived as kind of a “dumb” creature. Now don’t get me wrong, he’s not as dumb as the mummy…but he’s portrayed as pretty dumb. Of course there are movies where that is not the case, there is always Teen Wolf, but when you really look at the big picture, werewolves just don’t get their day in the sun (or I guess full moon if you prefer).

In 1941 Universal tried to give the werewolf his glory day by making The Wolf Man. The story is of a man who is bitten by a werewolf late one night. Despite never believing in the mythical creature, he now begins turning into one at night, unwillingly stalking human prey. With the town outraged that a savage beast lurks on the streets at night, he doesn’t know what to do or who to turn to.

Now don’t get me wrong, I wanted a werewolf to have his day but his day kind of sucked. I felt like the werewolf it self wasn’t really that creepy or even methodical of a creature once our character turned. I gathered werewolves wonder around biting things randomly and are afraid of silver. When you turn into a werewolf, at least in this film you look kind of cute and cuddly, much like Chaka, the monkey creature from Land of the Lost.

The point of the Wolf Man saga really happens when there is no wolf man on screen. It is all about the man’s internal struggle between good and evil, himself and the beast within. The Wolfman really just was another Jekyll and Hyde story only instead of crazy old Hyde you are a crazy wolf. We spend more time watching the tortured spirit of the man and see little of the wolf. And to make matters worse, when I did see the wolf, I was not frightened of him.

Maybe all this is why werewolves are the vampire slaves in films. At least in this film, there just didn’t seem to be enough spooky content there. Yes, I know it’s hard for anyone to bash on a classic and The Wolf Man really is such. There is something about it that makes it worth watching, but most of that to me felt like Hollywood nostaligia, not for a spooky Halloween type film. The Wolf Man will have you shaking in your seat about as much as Teen Wolf (side note: Mike does this count as a Michael J. Fox joke?).

The Invasion of the Body Snatchers

A Review by Jason L. King

Starring: Kevin McCarthy, Dyna Winter
Directed by: Don Siegel
Rated: NR
Movie Released: 1956
IMDB Link

The summer months have been whisked away and we are now heading into autumn with leaves turning colors and people’s doorsteps sporting jack-o-lanterns and skeletons. October is Halloween, month of the monsters, hence why many of the reviews you are seeing are horror films or monster movies. Throughout the month of October 2009, I will be focusing at least a solid portion of my reviews on various movie monsters each week. Week #2’s movie monster is Aliens.

Final Grade:

Sometimes you set out in the world to make a B movie that catches the world by storm and in its ridiculousness you find a gem of a movie hidden amongst it after all. For the makers of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, that is exactly what happened. It was during a time when some of Hollywood’s most famed directors and writers were at that perfect place and time that they were willing to work on a project just to collect a paycheck. That paycheck they were collecting became the drive in movie alien sensation, Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

The film is about a small town doctor who is trying to convince the FBI that the world is being taken over by body snatching aliens in a small town. As the aliens grow into their new bodies, they steal all of your memories and antic so they look, talk, act and remember everything just like you do. The only problem is, some people can see right through this alien abducting some one’s body but no one believes them. No one except for a small town doctor who soon finds out he might be next.

If I told you the film was nothing to write home about, I think that would sum it up nicely. The idea feels like a strange episode worthy of the Twilight Zone and the actors do their best to make it through the script convincingly enough but there just feels to be something missing. There is a level of quality it wants to achieve but just does not reach. The main character played by Kevin McCarthy tries his best to pull the fantastical script along but hams it up almost too much. Many times his performance reminded me as one of the crazed “drug dealers” from 1936’s Reefer Madness.

However, as for the film as a whole, there is a lot of debate over what the film is really about. Is the film really about body snatching aliens, or is it a social commentary on McCarthyism and the Red Scare that were also themes of the time period? While that is left up to the viewer, it was a film that pulled people into drive in theaters at the time. (please tell me you all know what a drive in theater was correct?).

The Invasion of the Body Snatchers spawned 2 remakes, one in the 70’s and another only a few years ago starring Daniel Craig and Nicole Kidman, perhaps proof the the film has made an impact on Hollywood and pop culture over the years. Should you make it one of your favorite films for a spooky Halloween movie night? I don’t think so. If you’ve got some time and want to enjoy some old B movie double feature type show, Invasion of the Body Snatchers might be for you. However, watching the movie I felt that while it is one of the better B list movies I have seen, it still isn’t going to appeal to the masses today. None the less, for what it is and what it was trying to be, the film does succeed. If I suggested it as a must watch, you’d question my sanity (many of you do any way)!

?>