Archive for September, 2005

Serenity

A Film Review By The Mike

Rating:RATED PG-13 for Intense Violence and Discussion of Nethers being Twixt.
Starring: Nathan Fillion, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Alan Tudyk
Directed By: Joss Whedon

Final Grade:

Shortly after we’re introduced to the titular ship in Serenity (after a jaw-dropping opening that the undeniably cool Chiwetel Ejiofor makes his own), Capt. Malcom Reynolds announces to his crew that “we may experience some turbulence and then… explode.” while they’re making a “routine” landing. In one sentence, and with no prior experience with Firefly, the short-lived show the movie is a continuation of, the film had told me exactly what to expect from it. I was introduced to a crew of bandits that aren’t especially good at being bad, and knew that I was going to experience a light-hearted romp that would leave me grinning. Or at least that’s what I hoped for.

For a while, I doubted myself. There were a few slow scenes, some minor defects in direction, and a lack of explanation for some of the characters’ actions (which was no doubt something I missed on TV). But I couldn’t stop watching, couldn’t stop grinning, and couldn’t stop being enthralled by each and every scene. It’s now safe to say that I was watching a future science-fiction classic.

For those that weren’t familiar with the show, I’ll give a little backstory. It’s 500 years from now, and Earth has become too populous for its own good. Millions and millions have left Earth’s atmosphere, terraforming planets on the other end of the solar system and creating a governing Alliance that rules over most of them. As with any society, however, there cannot be total adherence to these principles. Several less-fortunate planets are left looking like the old west, and the people on these planets are left to fend for themselves to survive. That’s where the Serenity comes in. Led by Capt. Reynolds (Nathan Fillion), the crew has become a bunch of drifters that take the jobs they can get, whether they are legal or not. They’re not bad guys by any means, they’re just frontiersmen.

This crew is what gives the movie its heart. Capt. Reynolds is a maverick leader who’s never the most personable person on board, but is always the most assured, even in error. He’s seconded by Zoe (Gina Torres), a tough gal, and her husband Wash (Alan Tudyk, AKA Steve the Pirate!), the ship’s whimsical pilot. Also on board are the tough guy, Jayne(Adam Baldwin); the sweet little mechanic, Kaylee (Jewel Staite, who’s a total cutie); and the ship’s doctor, Simon. We also find that they’ve acquired Simon’s sister, River (Summer Glau), a psychic/government weapon who sets the story in action. It seems the Alliance is afraid she might have information she shouldn’t have, and wants her back (which is where Ejiofor’s “Operative” comes into play).

One of my biggest concerns throughout the movie was getting to know the crew, which was a tough job. Kaylee, Jayne, and the Captain were all vibrant and lovable from the start, and River was an enigma that kept me interested. But there’s little getting to know Zoe or Wash (although he does have a few great one-liners), and when Reynolds’ love interest, Inara, comes on board the film gives little background into her character. I assume that most of this is something that fans of the show will not notice, but as a newcomer I have to admit a little frustration in the development of these characters.

But, as I said above, the movie alleviated my concerns as it went on. I got to know and understand most of the crew, and there was enough chemistry (both dramatic and comedic) between them that I truly cared what happened to them. And when the film does get to its unflinching and unsympathetic final battles, I couldn’t help feeling the intensity of seeing this crew under danger of extinction. It’s rare that you truly feel the characters that we deem “heroes” are in trouble when the chips are down, but Serenity manages itself beautifully, and doesn’t let the audience off easy.

Serenity gets us involved with its characters and their motivations, shows us both the good and bad sides of their endeavors, and, by doing so, lets us go into battle with them. It involves the viewer emotionally like no film of its sort has in a while, which makes me inclined to give it nothing less than my highest recommendation. Even if you’re not acquainted with Firefly, Serenity is a stand-alone sci-fi epic that I surely hope will lead to more from the ship and its remaining crew. I feel like a geek saying it, but I know that I’ll be first inline if the ship gets another mission, hopefully next to a friendly Kaylee look-alike. Yep, Joss Whedon’s won me over big time with this lovable crew of ragamuffins.

Kiss Kiss Bang Bang

A Film Review By Jason L. King

Starring: Robert Downey Jr., Val Kilmer
Directed By: Shane Black
Rated: R for language, violence and sexuality/nudity

Final Grade:

Box Office Bullet Points: The Movie In A Nutshell

*One of the funniest films I have seen this year (next to 40 Year Old Virgin and Wedding Crashers)

*Why Did Warner Brothers Burry this film so quickly? They never gave it a fighting chance. If they gave Alexander a chance, they deserve to give this film a chance!

*Val Kilmer films rarely see much screen time, despite usually being good films. I just don’t understand why Hollywood has a strong dislike for the man.

*The Robert Downey Jr narration is filled with wisecracks that critique modern day cinema, classic detective tales and the American Moviegoing public.

Directed by Lethal Weapon creator Shane Black, this hilarious, yet very R rated detective tale has all the right stuff. It’s got your campy but always entertaining classic detective case, two very colorful gumshoes (Robert Downey Jr and Val Kilmer) and an equally entertaining supporting cast. What really makes this film work is Downey Jr and Kilmer’s on screen chemistry. Their constant back and forth banter makes this film laugh out loud funny. Why Warner Brothers burried this wonderfully directed and outstandingly acted film is a mystery to me. This film is one of those hidden gems that I was very glad that i actually Paid to see!

The Verdict:
If you get a chance to check it out and the big screen, make an effort to do so. However it’s been in and out of theaters quickly due to no faith in it from it’s Distributor. So pick it up on rental shelf and watch it with some friends. You’ll be glad you did.

The Exorcism of Emily Rose

A Film Review By The Mike

Rating: PG-13 for Intense Physical Contortions, Violence/Self-Harm, and Demons
Starring: Tom Wilkinson, Laura Linney, Campbell Scott
Directed By: Scott Derrickson

Final Grade:

The Exorcism of Emily Rose is a horror film that has been released in the wrong day and age. 30 years ago, before the “Bloody 80’s” and the “Bloody-Awful 90’s” desensitized horror viewers and made the genre into something that rarely inspired them to take its name literally, this film would have been met with controversy and chaos, much like other films of the Mid 70’s. It was in this time period that Hollywood dropped some of its most theologically horrifying films on the market, with audience shredding results. Few people today realize that horror films are capable of doing more than providing a fleeting glance at some contained situation of attack on a populace of characters that is far from innocent. The Exorcism of Emily Rose, however, remembers.

Thus, director Scott Derrickson, the crew, and an all-star cast have set out to create a horror film that’s more than a series of random events that only make the audience feel momentary shards of anxiety. They’ve also set out to make a film that doesn’t shy away from its themes for a light moment or a good laugh. And though it might get a reputation as more of a courtroom drama than a horror film by many bloodthirsty viewers, I think this is the type of horror film that the serious cinemagoer has been waiting for.

The plot, as you might have guessed, focuses on a girl named Emily Rose. But it doesn’t focus specifically on her, instead showing us the events that followed her death and perceived possession, and how they effected the people involved, particularly the priest that presided over the ceremony. He is charged with negligence in the case of Emily’s death, but his only concern is for telling Emily’s story, the way she wanted it to be told. This leads to a series of explanations of what happened, what might have happened, and what might have been the alternatives. The film in no way gives a definitive statement at any time that says – “This actually happened like this, with 100% certainty.” But it does offer ideas. And theories. And little bits of knowledge that might effect how the characters (and the viewers) accept those theories and ideas.

None of this matters without a connection to the characters involved. Luckily, the film offers some of the very best actors that you probably don’t know by name in the main roles. Most noticeable is Tom Wilkinson (In the Bedroom, Batman Begins) as the priest, who’s a man of incredible endurance and moral rigidity despite the harrowing events that surround him. He’s defended in trial by Laura Linney (Primal Fear, Love Actually), whose character is a great example of a repressed uncertainty and forced confidence that often occurs when beliefs are challenged. On the opposing side is Campbell Scott (The Spanish Prisoner, Roger Dodger) as a prosecutor that’s probably the film’s most fascinating character – A “man of God” who must disprove the priest’s words and make a scientific explanation the final say in the case.

There will be gorehounds and thrillseekers that will be utterly disappointed by this “Exorcism”. And there are those that will try to stay on the film’s plane of thought, yet will be deterred by the attempts to add “modern” horror standards (The “Demon” visions and the “out-of-the-blue” car crash sprung to my mind). But I think that this film deserves more than that, because those that view it with a willingness to be inspired to think will probably leave the theater very satisfied.

In fact, I think the most true “horror” aspect of this film, like The Exorcist and The Omen in the 70’s, is that it does not provide us with one “ultimate” evil. Unlike the nearsighted or unexplained horrors that have dominated the last two decades, this one reminds us that the horrifying events it shows are only part of the equation – and that something more terrifying and more difficult to explain is lying behind these events.

It’s a method of approach that I wish more filmmakers would consider before giving their film the label, when in reality they inspire little to no real “horror”.

Paradise Now

A Film Review By Jason L. King

Starring: Eric Bana, Daniel Craig
Directed By: Ali Sulliman, Kais Nashef
Rated: PG-13 for thematic elements

Final Grade:

With the images of a war torn Iraq and our soldiers fighting for liberty and freedom for the entire world flooding our news stations, our newspapers and the internet news every day, few people really begin to wonder, just what it looks like from the other side. Every day we read another story about a suicide bomber willing to take his life for the cause, and we immediately dismiss them as an impulsive, mentally unstable human being. But films like Paradise Now show us just how ignorant that viewpoint really is.

Paradise Now is a Palestine film that deals with 2 childhood best friends who are just getting by in life. Their jobs are mediocre, their families aren’t poor, but they aren’t rich either. Both of them have a love for their God and their country and have always said they are willing to put everything on the line to help further their country’s cause. But when they are finally recruited to be suicide bombers in near by Tel Aviv, the two best friends must decide if what they said they would do their whole lives, is really something they want to follow through with.

This foreign language film is only seeing the light of day in the United States because of it’s academy award nomination for Best foreign language picture. The theme of suicide bombers is not something that the general public really runs out and embraces, even though this film is not saying America is an evil empire. None the less, the subject hits home as we watch more of our soldiers being killed by suicide bombers every night on the news.

Despite it’s controversial subject matter, the film has many stong points. The acting is very well done. We can literally see the change of heart in the emotions of the two men. Even if you were to watch the film without it’s subtitles and muted, you could easily follow what was going on just through facial expressions, and the emotions that are shown in the film. The two main characters each do a fantastic job of potraying their change of heart in one of the more powerful performances I have seen this year.

The director does a very nice job of recreating the setting of the war torn Palestine country. Visions of crumbling buildings, grafitti and dusty, dirty delapetated buildings flood the landscape. The setting really helps accent the absurdity of how these people are ruining their own beautiful country through years of struggle. The director uses the setting to his advantage, showing us how the brothers are the same way. Their families years of struggle for the cause has left their lives in just as much dismay and crumbling, just like the buildings around them.

What makes this film really hard to bear for Americans is the idea that they are trying to get us to sypathize with a terrorist. As we watch these characters and follow them as the plot unfolds, you begin to care about them. For me this was tough because I knew that their actions (planning to kill innocents) was something that was so morally incorrect. Making a suicide bomber seem human to the audience is a very tough thing to do, and although the director did a great job of doing so, I think it’s something the public may find very hard to accept

Overall Paradise Now did a great job of showing me what it’s like to be on that other side, and gave me more insight to the Muslim ideals. While I may not agree with their actions, better it gave me a better understanding of them. This film is controversial, but I think it drives home a message that some of us don’t want to hear. The other side is human too. Despite their differing ideas, and some outlandish behavior by the radicals, their morals come in to play too.

Transporter 2

A Film Review By Jason L. King

Rating:Rated PG-13 for violence, disturbing images, some partial nudity and thematic material
Starring:Jason Statham
Directed By:Louis Leterrier

Final Grade:

What happens when you give a monkey the keys to a Hollywood writing room and tell them to write an action film? You get one of the most awesomely bad action flicks of recent history that’s what. A few years ago someone who may not have been fully sane greenlit “The Transporter.” Who would have guessed that that insane person would greenlight a sequel to the film!

Jason Statham returns as Frank Martin, The Transporter, in this late summer high octane flick, The Transporter 2. A few years from where we left off at the end of the first film, we find Frank well off in Miami still transporting goods for people no questions asked as well as chauffeuring a young boy around as a favor to a friend. But when the boy becomes part of a kidnapping plot and a threat to national security, Frank finds himself back in the game again in full force. Fast cars, gunfire and high action martial arts fill the big screen as The Transporter saves the day the only way he knows how.

Make no mistake, this was the cheesiest film I have seen in a while. On a cheese scale of 1-10 I give this film a 12, and yet somehow still can say I enjoyed it. It’s pointless action, pointless action and more pointless action with eccentric bad guys and horrific special effects and an even more ridiculous plot. But then again if you were hoping for Oscar winning material, you were definitely in the wrong theater to begin with.

Fans of the original film (there are probably only a handful of them) should rest assured that this film pulls out all the stops when It comes to entertainment. While the martial arts are choreographed well, a lot of the time they are so over the top that they look cool and are fun to watch but very unbelievable.

Jason Statham makes the film enjoyable. Statham does a wonderful job in this fluff role, and is building a small franchise off a movie that never should have seen it’s way to the big screen in the first place. Statham has the charisma to carry a major role, and is fun to watch. His performance is laughable at times, but that’s mainly because the script doesn’t give him much to work with. It’s easy to point out The Transporter 2’s faults, after all they stick out like a sore thumb. The ridiculous villain woman who for some reason wears only lingerie, Frank’s odd ball way of disarming a bomb from his car, or worst of all the badly done computer generated out of control airplane are all easy examples of where the Transporter fails. But one really must ask, does a film like this take itself seriously?

So is the Transporter 2 good? It’s not good by most standards. Its plot is terrible, its special effects are almost idiotic and it may be a waste of your hard-earned money to see it in theaters. But if you are a fan of the first film, or just a fan of REALLY cheesy action films you’ll have a soft spot for the Transporter 2 just like I do. I’d love to tell you to forget this film ever existed, but Jason Statham is just too cool for me to do that. This film screams “guilty pleasure” for me, but who said I have any credibility in the movie world anyway? If they make a 3rd Transporter film, I’d be there. I guess that means Transporter 2 gets 2 thumbs up from me!

?>