Archive for September, 2004

Mr. 3000

A Film Review By Jason L. King

Rating:Rated PG-13 for sexual content and language.
Starring:Bernie Mac
Directed By:Charles Stone III

Final Grade:

Baseball is America’s pastime. Anyone who has played the game tells you abut the smell of the turf, the taste of the dirt and the smell of the sweat and leather all accented by the cracking sound of a bat. The pros talk of the roar of the fans and the adrenaline rush that makes you feel like an immortal. Off the ball field the players are just normal guys like you and me, but on the field even if it is only for one moment, they are like gods.

The story behind Mr. 3000 tells the tale of one such immortal God, Stan Ross. Stan believed he had made his mark when he reached 3000 career base hits. Upon reaching this milestone and feeling his spot in the hall of fame was secured Stan the Man stepped away from the game once and for all and became an entrepreneur using his name Mr. 3000 as his trademark. But 9 years later this cocky former pro finds out an error in the record books turns out to only make him Mr. 2997. In order to live up to his Trademark name, Stan tries to make a miraculous comeback to the game at age 47. Laughed at by his teammates the cocky old timer learns the lessons he never learned in his youth about teamwork, and in the process he gives his team an attitude that may spark the winning streak the team so desperately needs.

Bernie Mac does a great job as the cocky ballplayer, Stan Ross. His ridiculous antics and over the top cockiness is almost too much at times. Some may tell us that the role was trying to make a statement about ball players today, especially as they poke fun at big slugger Barry Bonds with a rip off Reebok commercial, but for me it was just too over the top. But none the less, you can’t help but chuckle at Stan’s antics and can’t help but laugh at a player who is so obsessed with himself that he literally talk to his image on the scoreboard in centerfield.

Like any sports film, this is the lighthearted fluff that everyone expected. From start to finish you pretty much know what is going to happen and the valuable lessons that will be learned. Following suit with kids films like Little Big League and Rookie of the Year this film takes a look at what the game of baseball should be about, Friends and fun. But make no mistake Moms and Dads, by that I didn’t mean it was a family safe flick. There is enough language and sexual comments that are made that can keep an overprotective mom occupied with tossing her hands over her son’s ears. Scenes such as a Japanese pitcher who doesn’t know how to properly string together obscenities, and Ross’s bad attitude and the occasional swear word makes sure to remind us that this movie isn’t one intended for the little ones.

Cinematically this film brings nothing new to the table. The camera shot and angles are simple and straightforward. The only time anything actually impressed me is an overhead shot of the home plate, where a tipped off foul ball flies up and almost hits the camera. To me at least, it leapt out at me and looked cool, but was nothing great.

In the end, Mr. 3000 is everything a critic can expect out of September. It’s a lighthearted popcorn flick that couldn’t hold a candle to a summer blockbuster or a fall Oscar Contender. But then again Mr. 3000 isn’t aspiring to be either one of those. The problem is with so many other great baseball flicks such as the Major League Series and more, Mr. 3000 is far to average overall to be remembered. Soon it will find itself sitting alone and unrented on rental shelves across America, right next to a copy of Mr. Baseball starring Magnum P.I.

First Daughter

A Film Review By Jason L. King

Rating:Rated PG for language, sexual situations and alcohol-related material
Starring:Katie Holmes, Michael Keaton
Directed By:Forest Whitaker

Final Grade:

Before going to see First Daughter in Theaters I decided to try and do a little research. I wanted to find out why girls are obsessed with stories of beautiful young princess’s finding romance. “Why can’t the story be about a normal girl?” I asked. After all guys like stories of normal guys who do really cool things in action films. Why must the girl always be a princess? After a long time of surveying a lot of girls, I didn’t get a real great answer. Maybe I didn’t get a good answer because as one girl told me, “you are a boy, you just wouldn’t understand.” But after discovering I wouldn’t understand, I headed to the theaters anyway.

Katie Holmes stars in First Daughter as Samantha Mackenzie, the daughter of the president. Sam wants to get out of the pressures of and the limelight and chooses to go to college thousands of miles away from the White House. But Sam quickly learns that there is no escaping being the President’s daughter anywhere she goes. Sam has to learn to make friends, fall in love and try to live a normal life in college with two secret service men following her around, and a nation that watches her every move.

I swear we saw this same story earlier this year. Oh wait folks, we did! It was called Chasing Liberty and Starred Mandy Moore instead of Katie Holmes. While I did miss out on the wonder known as Chasing Liberty, a copy of the DVD sits on my shelves here because of the girlfriend. Someday I may get around to it. I have read 90% of the shooting script to Chasing Liberty though and out of what I remember First Daughter is almost…Gasp! The Same Story! Why they released two of these films in the same year is beyond me, but out of everything I have read and heard, First Daughter is the better film.

What I do know from watching First Daughter is that Katie Holmes is the most adorable, charming young girls on the big screen today. She is attractive and she can act. This has been proven in a plethora of films Holmes has been in over the last few years, including Pieces of April. She pretty much shines all through this film as well, even in spots where the story itself drags. Her co-star Amerie Rogers who plays Mia, the college roommate also does a great job as well.

Michael Keaton plays the president in the film and while it is nice to see him, he seems very out of place. Keaton was once a star with the Batman films, but then disappeared into the senseless void for a few years. Now every time I see him I just picture him saying, “I’m Batman.” Poor guy. There is even a scene where he comes upstairs from the white house basement to say share a midnight snack with his daughter. As she asks him, “Where did you come from Dad?” I almost immediately expected him to say, “I was in the batcave and thought I heard something amuck upstairs.

First Daughter succeeds as a film is through its comedic moments. From start to finish the story is filled full of fun characters, whether it be great lines given to Samantha, Her roommate Mia, or Sam’s two secret service agents that accompany her on a day to day basis. Little comments like Mia referring to the Secret Service men as Men in Black action figures gives the audience something to chuckle about.

On top of that the film is family friendly! Unlike Chasing Liberty that has a few scenes that might have parents covering their little ones eyes, First Daughter is good clean family fun from start to finish. There really isn’t anything in the film that would have parents covering the eyes of their young ones, yet the film isn’t a complete cheese fest either. It works well as a fun “date” movie for the unlucky boys who get drug to it by their loving girlfriends as well as a film for the young girl who still wants to see the beautiful girl get her dream guy.

In the end, First Daughter works well for what it is. The problem is that it so formulaic it’s so easy to compare to other films. While I don’t suggest for you to run right out and see the film right away, you could do far worse. In a genre of film where I normally cringe, I found a little enjoyment. Check it out if you are in the mood for something light-hearted and chick flicktastic.

Garden State

A Film Review By The Mike

< Rating:RATED R for Drug use, sexuality, and language 
Starring: Zach Braff, Natalie Portman, Peter Sarsgaard 
Directed By: Zach Braff 

Final Grade: 

Garden State, the first film written and directed by Zach Braff, is a film that becomes incredibly frustrating in its final act. For well over an hour, it had me in love with its quirky characters and odd situations, and the fact that it dives into the bag of overused cliches to find its conclusions had me infuriated.

One could argue this is a sign that Braff didn’t really know what to do with his idea once he got it started. It reminded me a lot of my creative writing classes in college. The idea, the setup, and the characters were always the easiest things to come up with. When did people start wondering what to do, and asking the professer and their classmates for advice? When they got to the ending. Braff, I think, suffered from the same ailment here. To his credit, he managed to end his film by wrapping things up sufficiently. But there’s definitely a feeling that he could have done it better. Can I come up with a better conclusion? Probably not. But I’m not the one writing a movie.

So far, I sound as if I hated Garden State. On the contrary, I quite loved it. It’s a film full of interesting characters in lifelike settings, that manages to be incredibly emotional and funny, sometimes at the same time. If not for its conclusion, I feel I’d be praising it as a classic.

The acting, first and foremost, is spot on. Braff is the centerpiece and handles the role well, especially in the more dramatic scenes. Peter Sarsgaard, an underrated young supporting actor, is excellent as his best friend, and bit parts from people like Ian Holm and rapper Method Man are handled perfectly. The real treat, however, is Natalie Portman as the female lead. Her character is portrayed with a vigor and joy that’s rare on the screen today, and is truly one of the more remarkable performances I’ve seen in recent memory.

The mood of the film is also great, seeming like an odd mixture of the worlds of John Hughes in the 80’s and Wes Anderson in the late 90’s. The soundtrack is used as a device in helping carry the story where it needs to go, both emotionally and literally, and Braff’s camerawork, especially in close-ups on characters facial expressions (mainly his own), is spot-on.

Still, I think that, the film would be a failure in my eyes if it weren’t for Portman’s energetic performance, thanks mainly to the ending. Garden State is a film that I both loved and was disappointed by. I’m giving the edge to the love for now, and will definitely keep an eye out for whatever Braff decides to do next. For despite all my misgivings about its story’s conclusions, I’m compelled to list Garden State as one of the better films of the year.

Mean Creek

A Film Review By The Mike

Rating:R for Language, Violence, and Little Kids Kissing
Starring: Rory Culkin, Trevor Morgan, Josh Peck
Directed By: Jacob Aaron Estes

Final Grade:

Jacob Aaron Estes’ Mean Creek is one of the best demonstrations of child acting I’ve ever seen. I walked into the theater expecting to be annoyed by the fact the main character was a Culkin and to urge about singing “Scotty Doesn’t Know” everytime that kid from Eurotrip showed up, but the urges were gone soon after the film started. What I got was part Deliverance, part Stand by Me, and part Mystic River – added together to make for one of the most engrossing dramas of the year.

The film opens with a home video shot of an altercation between two young teens. George, who’s trying to make a video of himself, probably to gloat at later, becomes offended when Sam picks up his video camera to look at it. George responds by doing what he thinks best: beating Sam to a pulp.

Sam and, more intently, his brother are naturally put off by George’s assault, and begin brainstorming ways to “get him back”. Of course, hurting George would only bring them down to his level. Sam decides on a deeper and more embarrassing plan, and soon he and his friends are whisking George and themselves away on a boat ride under the nicest of pretenses.

What follows is not what Sam or his friends expected. The characters all become involved with each other, even George, and soon things spiral out of control. I wouldn’t imagine going any further into detail on this plot, which is one that unfolds as we learn more and more about who these kids are and what has brought them here, culminating in a result that’s unforgettable.

Mean Creek hits the dynamics of teen logic and rationale at the core. We watch these characters become deeper and deeper with every moment, and by film’s end are entranced in who they are, even if we’ve only seen them in one situation. For in life, we only see the parts of people we are allowed to see, and that often can lead to conclusions we never really know are true.

Mean Creek embraces that fact and subverts it through the media of film. Just as George’s character films himself, Estes’ camera looks in on the lives of these young people in a way that only a movie can. We see their thoughts stated, their emotions expressed, and their lives changed forever…all by one simple turn of events. And in the end we realize that a movie, just like events in every day life, isn’t always the full story.

Forgotten

A Film Review By The Mike

Rating:RATED PG-13 for Language, Scariness, and Little Children
Starring: Julianne Moore, Dominic West, Anthony Edwards
Directed By: Joseph Ruben

Final Grade:

Playing out like an extended episode of The X-Files, The Forgotten is a film plagued by a plot conclusion that will undoubtedly be its most memorable point. Most viewers will forget the acting, the direction, and almost everything else outside this plot twist, and will either take a large leap of faith or give an angry scowl of disdain. If you haven’t seen the film, you might want to steer clear of the rest of this review (though, to be honest, the trailer made the possibilities of the twist pretty obvious.)

We start with a look at the story that leads up to the revelation of the film’s antagonizing force. A NYC mom, plagued by her son’s disappearance and apparent death months earlier, wakes up one day to find all traces of her son’s existence missing. Soon, her husband’s remembrance of her is gone too, and so is an acquaintance’s recollection of his daughter, who also disappeared. But who or what is responsible for the phenomenon?

Before its inevitable plot turn, The Forgotten manages to be a highly effective and intriguing thriller. Julianne Moore shows once again why she’s one of the best actresses living today with a emotive, well-played portrayal of fear and paranoia, while her supporting cast (particularly Rock Star’s Dominic West and ER’s Anthony Edwards) plays the other hand adequately. There are a lot of thought inspiring questions raised, and a solid bit of action too. It’s a perfectly capable thriller, until it gets to that fork in the plot’s road.

The way I see it, The Forgotten had three possible ways to explain its mysterious conflict. Two of the three have been done often, and are simple yet interesting. The third sits as the “well, I suppose they could do that, but it seems awfully silly” choice. As you can probably guess by my comments leading up to this, The Forgotten embraces option three.

Once the film reveals exactly how it plans to deal with its conflict, the viewer is left with a choice to make. Should they accept this story and suspend their disbelief, even if the rest of the film has been so grounded in reality? Or is this simply a cheap screenwriter’s trick, designed because the writer didn’t know how else to get himself out of a jam?

I’ll leave the decision of whether or not The Forgotten’s final act is worthwhile or not to you, because I feel this film is one that has to be looked at on an individual basis. This is sure to make it a “love it or hate it” selection, and those that expected a new horror classic might be disappointed. I chose to suspend my disbelief, thanks mostly to the fact that the scenes leading up to the twist worked so competently and the fact that it really was the only way to end the film without far too many contrivances. Whether or not you feel the same is up to you, though I highly doubt you’ll fail to remember viewing this thriller.

?>