Archive for May, 2003

Finding Nemo

A Film Review By The Mike

Rating:RATED G for Good for Kids
Starring: Albert Brooks, Ellen Degeneres, Willem Dafoe
Directed By: Andrew Stanton

Final Grade:

Upon its release last May, a little film called Finding Nemo went unnoticed by critics. Well, to tell the truth, most critics noticed it, and noticed that it was a movie they would recommend. In fact, of the 172 reviews listed on RottenTomatoes.com, only 2 reported disliking it. The only critics that didn’t seem to notice were the ones on this website. That being said, I admit that our webmaster made a big mistake, and therefore should be punished. But luckily for you, The Mike refuses to let said film go unnoticed, and will bring you his review now.

Finding Nemo, like many other movies, is animated. I generally dislike animated films. I figure if you can’t have real people providing at least some of the action, then it’s ultimately a poor idea for a movie. But a few of them have captured my heart, either through being way too cool in my youth (Transformers: The Movie), through accurately portraying the dream of all hideous creatures like myself (Beauty & The Beast), or through the use of monsters that are cool and really cute little girls that sound like cousins of mine (Monsters, Inc.). That being said, I didn’t have much interest in a story about a fish that loses his son.

Come on people! Why do 99% of cartoon films have to be about kids losing their parents? It’s officially the most overused cliché in the history of film. It’s a firmer rule than “only the virgin survives” or “don’t cut the red wire”. If the movie’s a cartoon, then it in some shape or form will be about children and parents being separated. Finding Nemo took this cliché and ran with it, to the tune of almost 340 million dollars at the box office.

OK, so we fell for it. We should be ashamed. That being said, the film, not surprisingly (even with my aversion to the animated film) is a success. No one in their right mind can say it isn’t, and even those in the wrong mind like myself have to give it props. Director Andrew Stanton creates a truly epic looking film, with sea landscapes and creatures that are more beautiful at times than they could ever be in real life. This is another of my usual beefs with animated films, but in this case it looks too cool to be mad about.

The story is helped along greatly by the voice talents involved, with names like Albert Brooks, Ellen Degeneres, Willem Dafoe, and Geoffrey Rush chipping in. But the most entertaining voice work probably belongs to Director Stanton, who chimes in as Crush the Sea Turtle and is, for lack of a better term “totally gnarly!”

And yes, the film is as funny as can be, although it falls prey to another animated film shortcoming – the lack of physical humor. Many of the best comedies are enhanced to that level by things like facial expressions and body movements, an art that animated films have yet to perfect. The best explanation for their style I can think of is to call them “cartoonish”, but that’d just be stupid to use as an insult.

But the key to gauging these negative things lies in one question: Would Finding Nemo work as a live action film? The answer is a flat out no, and therefore I must admit that Finding Nemo is both an animated film and a good film. It’s funny, it’s good looking, and it’s got a lot of heart. It’s not a masterpiece, and if I’d have written this review the weekend of its release I would have lowered its grade for not even being the best film of the weekend. But it’s a film that’s enjoyable for both kids and adults, and there’s nothing bad I can say about that. So yeah…I admit it. I recommend Finding Nemo.

The Italian Job

A Film Review By Jason L. King and The Mike

Rating:Rated PG-13 for Cars, theivery and overweight Somoans.
Starring: Charlize Theron, Marky Mark Wahlberg, Mos Def, Edward Norton and Jason Stathaam
Directed By: F. Gary Gray

Final Grades:

Grade B:

Jason’s Review:

Mark Wahlberg has always scared me. Each time I visit a film of his I find myself wondering why am I here? I know that over the last few years the name Mark Wahlberg has been the cause of Single-handedly destroying remake after remake, and has earned a spot on the Box Office Boredom list of people to poke fun at. What I am trying to say is that to me Mark Wahlberg is a joke. It isn’t Wahlberg himself that is a laughing matter, but instead it is his choice of roles is what always results in laughter. His last few roles of Planet of The Apes and The Truth About Charlie, have been remakes that people still despise because they threw the original idea out the window and did their own thing. So when The Mike and I had a chance to go check out the Italian Job, I felt I was up for a good laugh and headed off to the movie lines.

The Italian Job is the story of a group of super crooks that pull off a job in Italy that paid them 35 Million in gold bricks. But when greed gets a hold of one of the crooks, Steve, (Edward Norton) kills one of the group members and leaves the rest for dead. Years later, still haunted by that fateful job, Charlie (Mark Wahlberg) gathers up his original crew and a the daughter of his late partner, who also happens to be one of the best safe crackers in the area. The team vows to get revenge on Steve by pulling off the ultimate heist leaving the greed ridden crook with nothing.

My first disclaimer is that I have not seen the Michael Caine Original. The film does not exist in the Ames area; believe me I have looked. Therefore, you aren’t going to get a lot of “this was worse than the original” type of stuff because I don’t know. I’ve actually been told that the two flicks really only share the name, and don’t really have anything in common with each other. But I only can base my review on what I saw. And to be honest with you, I surprised myself and liked what I saw…mostly.

The cast was a lower budget Ocean’s 11 cast compiled of Wahlberg, Norton, Charlize Theron, Donald Sutherland, Seth Green, Jason Statham, and Mos Def, but they all held their own. Wahlberg was no different that he has been in every movie he’s been in. The potential is there, once he breaks out of the Marky Mark “Good Vibrations” mode he is still stuck in. The Mike’s beloved Charlize was there because she was good looking. Just another pretty face (Sorry Mike). I didn’t really get much out of her character. Norton slept walked through the film (rumors have been out that Norton did not want to do this flick, and only did it because of contractual agreements with Paramount). Norton’s disinterest in the flick showed, and even though I can’t believe I am saying this, if someone Other than Norton was cast, the flick could have been more powerful.

Despite the bigger names like Wahlberg, Theron and Norton it was the lesser-known guys who made the flick. Jason Statham (Snatch, The Transporter) did a fantastic job as “bad ass” Handsome Rob. Statham’s role as the tough guy worked well for him, and his ridiculous carefree actions kept the film interesting to watch. And Seth Green was amazingly funny. I normally don’t say that about him, but his humorous antics, mixed with a cheesy back story of how he originally created Napster but had it stolen from him was a nice touch to the films comic element.

The film itself was lighthearted and predictable, but you knew that going into the flick. All in all the film is a speedy paced, action packed, fun heist flick that has you rooting for the bad guys (who are good in this case). Filled with creative ideas, some fun dialogue and some fun car scenes, the flick is overall joyride from start to finish.

The predictability of the flick and Norton’s lack of interest are what let the film down, that mixed with a few other minor things. But in the end, I can’t believe I am saying this, The Marky Mark Film gave me some Good Vibrations, and if you are in the mood for a lighthearted payback heist flick, The Italian Job just might be your cup of tea.

Final Grade: B

The Mikes Review:

Charlize Theron, if you’re out there reading this, please know that I love you. I can’t stop thinking about you. You invade my soul. You make me want to watch Sweet November and Reindeer Games constantly. I might even watch Trapped, although I don’t know if I’ll ever be desperate enough to watch Waking Up In Reno. I’m sorry that I don’t love you any more than Elisabeth Shue and Ashley Judd, but I hope you know I don’t love you less than them either. If you could find it in your heart to come to Iowa and settle down with a fat guy who’s comparably smart by our state’s standards and isn’t one of those pretty boy actors like that Stuart Townsend, I would build my world around you, as long as you pay off my college and car debts with your millions. I’m joking of course, I wouldn’t make you pay (In all reality, I know you’d fall for me so hard that you’d pay them without my asking…oops…Don’t read that last part Charlize). You complete me, and you’d have me at hello.

Oops…I’m supposed to be reviewing The Italian Job, aren’t I? Well, I had a review planned out, but it turns out that it would look a lot like the one on the left. Jason and I pretty much share an opinion on this film. But here I go anyway.

Since I sent out my message to Charlize already, I will state my greatest complaint about this film as a statement to Edward Norton. Listen up, Ed. You had a great debut in Primal Fear, and followed up with a few solid films. But contrary to your belief, you’re not king shnit. You had an obligation to this film, and you should have put your heart into it, instead of sleepwalking while moping with “I didn’t want to do this movie!!! It’s not fair!!!” remarks like a 12 year-old girl. Luckily for everyone else involved, you were off screen enough that the film was saved.

OK, now back to the real readers. As you probably guessed from my words to Mr. Norton, he gave one of the most uninspired and pathetic performances as the film’s villain in recent cinema history. It’ll be a long time before the young man from Baltimore gets any respect from me again. I spent a lot of time after the film picturing other actors (Johnny Depp came to mind, as well as Sam Rockwell) shining in Norton’s role and giving the film another level of entertainment. Unfortunately we’re stuck with Norton, who I’m hoping gets bumped from Hollywood’s A-list soon, unless he can get his head out of his you know what.

After expressing my love for Charlize and condemning Norton, the only point left for me to make is my opinion on the film. It’s called The Italian Job, and it proves to be one of the better action films made in some time. I knew a lot of people who expected little either due to their lack of respect for Marky Mark or the fact that it’s from the director of A Man Apart. It seems to me many have forgotten that, before A Man Apart, F. Gary Gray made a great film entitled The Negotiator that he seems to not get credit for, along with directing the comic hit Friday.

As I expected, Gray’s direction is solid. The action and chase scenes are tightly wound and beautifully shot, and the plot setting scenes move swiftly and easily. He also benefits from a witty script that has its share of funny moments (especially through Green’s character, as Jason noted) and good character development for an action film. Excluding Norton, he gets the perfect amount of help from his cast, who are also perfectly cast in their roles. Like Jason, I give mad props to Statham as Handsome Rob, who added humor and coolness in all of his scenes. After his work in Snatch, The Transporter and this, I’m hoping we’ll be seeing big things from him in the near future. Hell, he could have pulled off the villain role better than Norton did.

There’s not too much more I can say about this film that’s not four inches to the left of it. The Italian Job, though reportedly unfaithful to its source material (Why do I keep getting films with prerequisites? I never said I know everything!..OK, I did, but I didn’t really mean it!), was a thoroughly entertaining action film that is a great introduction to the upcoming summer blockbusters. If you go in to the theater expecting complexity, you’re in the wrong theater. If you go into the theater to be entertained and have fun, then The Italian Job is the prescription for your fever. Of course, I’m biased to my beloved Charlize. If you’re still reading, Charlize, I still love you, and this review would have been a lot better if Jason and I didn’t agree. Curse his black heart!

The Mike’s Grade: B+

There is one point I can make that I think puts The Italian Job over the top, but IF YOU PLAN ON SEEING THE MOVIE, DO NOT READ THE NEXT PARAGRAPH! Thanks. (Note: The Mike has written this in invisible mike ink. In order for the text to appear you must highlight the entire paragraph below…)

The Italian Job is a simple heist picture, and this is what I found to be it’s best quality. As the last half-hour of the movie passed, I sat in my seat immersed in the heist in progress, but also praying that the film wouldn’t delve into too many complex turns. I’d grown attached to each character and their role, and didn’t want a sudden slew of “Oh wait, I’m with him…but wait, he’s with me!” moments. And refreshingly, the film complied…Everything was as it seemed. There were no forced plot turns, no characters who suddenly changed their ways for no reason, just a simple good versus bad battle that can either go either one way or the other. It’s a simple and fun ending to a simple and fun film.

The In-Laws

A Film Review By The Mike

Rating:RATED PG-13 for some language (including the evil French one) and violence 
Starring: Michael Douglas, Albert Brooks, Robin Tunney, Ryan Reynolds, and Candace Bergin 
Directed By: Andrew Fleming 

Final Grade: 

Has Albert Brooks ever played a different character? I understand that the characters he’s played in films from Taxi Driver to My First Mister to the newly released The In-Laws are different people, but they all have the same tendencies and mannerisms. Like the great(ly overrated) Denzel Washington, Albert Brooks has made a career out of playing the same overly neurotic, tightly wound and unconfrontational character. Luckily for him, and for this remake, it’s usually funny.

The In-Laws is a simple formula film, the kind of contrasting character comedy that we used to see a lot of from Jack Lemmon and Walter Matthau. It’s clear to see, while watching his performance, that Brooks is the Lemmon of the script, timid and controlled, but ready to erupt if his control is challenged. On the other hand, the Matthau is Michael Douglas, playing his role with wide-eyed enthusiasm and a face-wide smirk, while too trying maintain control of his way of life. It’s a tried and true formula, but it can only be held together by chemistry…which these two luckily have.

The plot of the film is simple. Mark (Reynolds) and Melissa (Lindsay Sloane) are in love, and are getting married. But before this can happen, they need to meet each others’ parents, and more importantly their parents must meet each other. This brings us to the pairing of Mark’s father Steve (Douglas) and Melissa’s father Jerry (Brooks). Steve is a rogue CIA agent with a frisky young partner (Tunney), both of whom are a little unhinged and willing to take risks. Jerry is a podiatrist, or foot-doctor, whom is always clad in a fanny pack and whom is afraid of anything from heights to planes to water. Of course, Jerry accidentally wanders into Steve’s business affairs, and becomes his new partner, flying along to France and posing as the legendary “Fat Cobra” while the FBI is on their trail.

The In-Laws is not an entirely funny film, and it has a lot of jokes that fall flat. But it’s not entirely unfunny either, with a lot of jokes that hit the mark solidly. With most of the “comedies” so far this year failing miserably in their attempts at humor (Head of State and National Security come to mind), it’s a refreshingly fun flick.

The key that pushes this film over the edge of mediocrity is its engaging cast. Douglas has been one of the best actors in America for years, and he’s perfectly over the top. I wondered coming in if I could easily view him as a Bond-like spy, and I was not disappointed. Another refreshing point is the fact that the filmmakers refrained from making Douglas’ character too Bond-like. They never strayed into gadgetry and cheap tricks (barring an opening plane crash scene), instead making the spies reliant on secrecy and undercover prowess, along with a little disguise.

Brooks is also perfectly cast, doing what he does perfectly. I know we’ve seen him give this performance before, and alone it would be tiresome. But the fact that the setting and surrounding characters are different seems to always give new life to his character. It almost reminds of a bad film series seeing him playing the same role in so many films with different settings. We’ve had “Albert Brooks meets the Goth Chick” (aka My First Mister) and now “Albert Brooks meets the Spy”. Soon we’ll get “Albert Brooks in the Hood”, followed by “Albert Brooks in Space”! By then it might get old, but for now it’s still fun.

The rest of the cast also adds some fun. Tunney is a lot of fun to watch as Douglas’ assistant who seems to be waiting at every turn with the next step in the plan. Reynolds, who almost single-handedly made the ludicrous Van Wilder an entertaining movie (Key Word = Almost), adds some humor when he gets the chance, but sadly is mostly just a tertiary character. Bergin shows up half way through the film as Steve’s ex- wife, and adds a couple of laughs as well.

In the end, The In-Laws is a lightly funny film that is carried by a great cast. I laughed a lot, and cared about the characters enough to want to see what would happen next. It’s a fresh early summer film that will be soon forgotten because it’s not a blockbuster, but it’s still a good time and is worth your time if you’re looking for a quick fix.

Oh yeah…One more thing. This film is based off of an earlier film version of The In-Laws, which was released in 1979. I have not seen this film, and therefore can not properly judge whether I fully respected or should have fully disrespected. All I know is that as its own entity, I liked it. 

Bruce Almighty

A Film Review By Jason L. King

Rating:Rated PG-13 for language, sexual content and some crude humor. 
Starring: Jim Carrey, Jenifer Aniston, Morgan Freeman 
Directed By:Tom Shadyac 

Final Grade: 

Everyone goes through a rough time in his or her lives at some point. For me, it was a few years back, during my first year of college. My grades were not up to par, my Girlfriend of a year broke up with me, and no matter what kind of inspirational advice anyone gave me, life didn’t feel as though it was getting any better. My misfortunes couldn’t have been because I didn’t study enough, they couldn’t have been because I didn’t devote enough to the relationship, after all It could never be MY fault. So whom did that leave to blame? Well God of course. I mean, since God expects you to devote your whole life to him you would think the man could at least throw you a few bones every once in a while, right? Well as I learned God couldn’t give everyone everything they want, and even though the phrase annoys me,I learned there was truth to the phrase “The Lord Works in Mysterious Ways.” A few years later, I have a better love relationship with a fabulous person, and life is at a much higher point than it was a few years ago. So maybe God did answer my prayers…But If I was God I am sure I wouldn’t have answered them a heck of a lot sooner.

Bruce Nolan (Jim Carrey) had the same train of thought that I did a few years back. Bruce was a goofy news reporter who wanted it all, and always seemed to have everything backfire on him. He watched his job get taken away from him by a snobbish nemesis reporter, and watched his home life slowly crumbling. Everything he did of course was never his fault, and was easy to pass the blame on to God ignoring him. But when Bruce gets a visit from God himself (Morgan Freeman), God gives Bruce all of his powers, to prove to Bruce that playing God just might not be as easy as you would think.

The story is a little on the wacky side, and will make some Christians cringe but all in all the film had a lot more to it than a few simple laughs. Sure anything with Jim Carrey attached to it is bound to have comedy written on it, but Bruce Almighty puts a decent storyline right along with the humor. For all those Cringing Christians out there, I am happy to report that in Fact Bruce Almighty simply takes a humorous approach at explaining unanswered prayers, selfishness, helping others, and submitting yourself to God, and realizing that you alone could never be God. Now correct me if I am wrong, but a lot of that sounds like it is coming straight out of a Bible. The humorous situations, the ridiculous ways that Bruce handles situations and some of the things Bruce use his powers on may not all be something God would approve of, but I am fairly sure that the Underlying message is something even he would give a thumbs up to.

This film works because of Jim Carrey. We’ve watched Carrey grow over the years from Ace Ventura to what he is now, and to be all out truthful, I like what I have seen. Unlike Adam Sandler who is still trapped in the land of “Abbey Doobie”, Jim Carrey moved away from the “I can talk with my butt” stage while he still could, and moved on to new ways of entertaining audiences, which is why he can still be worth some good laughs yet today and Bruce Almighty proved it. Carrey’s rubberized face does a nice job of molding between the seriousness, the goofiness and the all around fun of the Character of Bruce, making the film an overall success. Make no mistake though, Carrey didn’t make the film all on his own. Carrey had a strong supporting cast of Morgan Freeman and Jennifer Aniston, two Hollywood Stars that are pretty darn good at what they do as well.

Like every comedy does, Bruce Almighty has its slow parts, and its share of “Bad” jokes, but this doesn’t really detract from the film. The wonderful thing about a well-rounded comedy is that it doesn’t try to appeal to a certain type of person, but instead has plenty of laughs for every type of filmgoer. What I find stupid, the next guy may find hilarious. The Makers of Bruce Almighty realized this and made a film that is an equal mix of both types of humor, so everyone is a winner in the end. Also It would be easy to say the Bruce Almighty tried to beat you over the head with it’s message and lost the “comedy” atmosphere it worked so hard in building during the first half of the film. But just like Liar Liar and The Mask, if you thought the film was going to have a sad ending, all I have to say is what were you thinking. Sure the ending was fluff, and tried to put a message amidst the humor, But in the end Bruce Almighty was exactly what it was supposed to be: fun. I’d have to say it is nothing outstanding, but Bruce Almighty proves to be “Bruce Alrighty” and worth a few bucks for a few good laughs. 

Mystic River

A Film Review By The Mike

Rating:RATED R for Violence and Language
Starring: Sean Penn, Tim Robbins, Kevin Bacon, Laurence Fishburne
Directed By: Clint Eastwood

Final Grade:

I haven’t cried in a movie theater since American Beauty, but I came awfully close last night. The film was Clint Eastwood’s latest directorial effort, Mystic River. Rarely has a film brought us characters that are so wonderfully realized and powerful. They’re the kind of characters that, whether we like them or not, are so real that when pain comes to them, pain comes to us too.

We’re introduced to our three main characters as children, on a day that they would never forget. They are Sean, Jimmy, and Dave, and they get caught writing their names in a wet cement sidewalk. When a man in a suit with handcuffs pulls up and calls them out, they don’t think to question him, until after Dave has been whisked away alone in the back seat of their car. What follows is left up to our imagination for the most part, but it’s still one of the most horrifying scenes of recent memory.

We move forward to the present, and meet Sean, Jimmy, and Dave again, now adults. Sean (Kevin Bacon) is a homicide detective trying his hardest to figure out what went wrong between him and his estranged wife, while working together with a cynical sergeant (Laurence Fishburne). When their small town is ripped apart by a gruesome murder, it’s Sean that must try and figure out what really happened.

Making the case no easy matter, is Jimmy (Sean Penn) who happens to be the father of the deceased girl. He also happens to have a troubled legal past, and to be a little “connected”. He uses this need in his need for vengeance, vowing to his dead daughter that he will catch and kill the murderer before the cops do.

The final cog is Dave (Tim Robbins), who we can tell has a few screws loose due to the incidents that were perpetrated against him as a child. He’s married to a woman named Celeste (Marcia Gay Harden), who doesn’t know what to think when he comes home drenched in someone else’s blood…and then finds out that Jimmy’s daughter was killed that same night.

These three stars, with the probable exception of the always-stellar Robbins, have never been better in their careers. Brian Helgeland’s script gives them juicy material to work with, and they never miss a beat. Penn is especially good as the “lead”, and will most likely garner at least an Oscar Nomination for Best Actor. While I’m convinced he deserves it, I actually believe Robbins gives the film’s deepest and most meaningful performance, creating a character that’s so intriguing and confusing that we’re mesmerized by his every movement. The support of Fishburne is solid, and the only complaint about the cast that I have is Laura Linney as Jimmy’s wife, a character that’s never explored enough to make her final revelations not seem over the top.

I mentioned the characters’ revelations above, and that’s really what this film is about. The plot and mystery are interesting and well done (I solved it an hour in to the film sadly, but it was just a lucky guess). The climactic scenes are among the most tense and gripping moments I’ve ever seen on the screen. The credit for this belongs to Eastwood, who puts these scenes together amazingly well. His direction is meticulous and thorough, very deserving of the little Gold statue as well.

Mystic River is one of the most powerful films I’ve ever seen, in its plot and its characters. The final couple of scenes seem a little out of place upon first thought, but when you really realize what’s just happened to the characters it all fits well. Kudos should be given to all involved in this wonderfully articulate film, and here’s hoping to hear its name mentioned early and often on Oscar Night. Go see it now, because Mystic River is one of the best films in many years.

?>